Difference between revisions of "ARK2/Community"
From ARK
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* Basecamp / Campfire - More customer oriented than coder oriented, costs $1000 p/a | * Basecamp / Campfire - More customer oriented than coder oriented, costs $1000 p/a | ||
* Gitter - Integrated with GitHub and common developer services, free but not open, dodgy security, login only via GitHub or Twitter account | * Gitter - Integrated with GitHub and common developer services, free but not open, dodgy security, login only via GitHub or Twitter account | ||
| − | * Atlassian / HipChat - Lots of integration, free/paid, not open | + | * Atlassian / HipChat - Lots of integration, free hosted/paid, not open |
| − | * | + | * RocketChat - Free and Open, self-serve, host very expensive, fewer integrations, but screenshare and videochat are free. |
Revision as of 14:07, 27 May 2017
A development and support community will be required for both the Project and the Service.
- User support
- Sysadmins support
- Developers support
An online chat service that integrates with an issue tracker, project manager, wiki, and code repository will be needed for developers. A chat, wiki, and forum will be needed for user support. It makes sense to use a single solution for both, either under a single brand or separate brands.
Needed Features:
- Chat: web and app
- Wiki
- GitHub integration
- CI system
- Bots
Possible options:
- Basecamp / Campfire - More customer oriented than coder oriented, costs $1000 p/a
- Gitter - Integrated with GitHub and common developer services, free but not open, dodgy security, login only via GitHub or Twitter account
- Atlassian / HipChat - Lots of integration, free hosted/paid, not open
- RocketChat - Free and Open, self-serve, host very expensive, fewer integrations, but screenshare and videochat are free.
