Difference between revisions of "ARK2/Community"
From ARK
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Needed Features: | Needed Features: | ||
+ | * Guest or OAuth | ||
* Chat: web and app | * Chat: web and app | ||
* Wiki | * Wiki | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
* Atlassian / HipChat - Lots of integration, free hosted/paid, not open | * Atlassian / HipChat - Lots of integration, free hosted/paid, not open | ||
* RocketChat - Free and Open, self-serve, host very expensive, fewer integrations, but screenshare and videochat are free. | * RocketChat - Free and Open, self-serve, host very expensive, fewer integrations, but screenshare and videochat are free. | ||
+ | * Slack | ||
+ | * Flock | ||
+ | * Mattermost |
Revision as of 14:42, 27 May 2017
A development and support community will be required for both the Project and the Service.
- User support
- Sysadmins support
- Developers support
An online chat service that integrates with an issue tracker, project manager, wiki, and code repository will be needed for developers. A chat, wiki, and forum will be needed for user support. It makes sense to use a single solution for both, either under a single brand or separate brands.
Needed Features:
- Guest or OAuth
- Chat: web and app
- Wiki
- GitHub integration
- CI system
- Bots
Possible options:
- Basecamp / Campfire - More customer oriented than coder oriented, costs $1000 p/a
- Gitter - Integrated with GitHub and common developer services, free but not open, dodgy security, login only via GitHub or Twitter account
- Atlassian / HipChat - Lots of integration, free hosted/paid, not open
- RocketChat - Free and Open, self-serve, host very expensive, fewer integrations, but screenshare and videochat are free.
- Slack
- Flock
- Mattermost