Victims may agree to support dismissal or a favourable plea, but they cannot agree to refuse to testify or withhold evidence. RPC 225 deals with the interaction between civil and criminal proceedings. He suggested that it would be appropriate for Hardy`s lawyers to discuss the settlement of the alleged victim`s civil rights, combined with a discussion of the alleged victim`s cooperation in obtaining a plea or dismissal of the charge against Hardy. But any civil settlement may not be ethical: Treitel on The Law of Contract (14th edition) believes that the legality of a successful prosecution agreement (which is not merely a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice or the offence of concealing a criminal offence under Section 5 of the 1967 Penal Code) should depend on the public interest in prosecuting. In addition, item 11-046 states that the court should also accept a recommended sentence or plea agreement that should treat with caution all attempts to jeopardize the liability of private criminal prosecutions. Court officials, who work for defendants in civil litigation where criminal activity is relevant, would probably be wise to warn their client of the risk that their opponent will later attempt to pursue private prosecutions. The idea that an alleged victim can provide assistance in a civil transaction favourable to an accused is also reflected in 98 OTF 19 (and states that a victim`s lawyer can argue ethically “e] that [a] ictim [a favorable plea in exchange for an admission from an accused] agrees). The notice also contains a warning language that a victim`s lawyer “must not imply that the lawyer is able to intervene in the proper administration of justice and criminal proceedings, or that the client enters into an agreement to falsify evidence.” “If… Agreements that include, for example, the promise not to prosecute would not be new, it is not clear. Nor should the victim receive more compensation than is owed under current civil law. In other words, the victim should not use the threat to report a crime or oppose a plea agreement to blackmail a broader settlement than it deserves. 98 FEO 19. “An ordinary civil law can, of course, be effectively compromised, although the facts leading to the claim may also constitute a criminal offence.
However, in such a case, an agreement to abandon “all judicial proceedings” may be illegal, since the rate is broad enough to cover possible civil and criminal proceedings. What`s interesting is whether the NFL suspended him for a while next season without paying. Remember, the NFL is fully aware that a dismissal (or not guilty in court) does not necessarily mean “innocent.” They have the opportunity to re-examine the case under a different burden than the criminal courts and to make their own judgment. Most NFL player contracts contain language that allows the NFL to punish for “behavioural deterrence for the league.” Even if the NFL is not convinced that there was an attack, other facts in the case may result in an NFL suspension. […] Domestic violence charges against Greg Hardy were dismissed. Hardy is the defensive end of the Carolina Panthers, who was tried by the district court for desascrising his ex-girlfriend.